Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47673/2024bail granted

Mukul Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-29Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47673 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== MUKUL RAY SON OF PANNALAL RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NAWANAGAR, P.S. - BIDUPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR 2.

MANI PRAKASH SON OF BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - VIHWARPUR, P.S. - BIDUPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 158 of 2024 dated 05.04.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 279, 354D, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act and section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kept the country made Katta in the room situated back side of the house of the informant. When the informant wake up for call of nature, he saw the petitioner fleeing away then the informant informed police thereafter, police came and seized the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47673 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/2 said arm.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 158 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T