Wakil Singh Yadav @ Wakil Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43648 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2022 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Wakil Singh Yadav @ Wakil Singh, Son Of Late Ram Rakshya Singh Yadav Resident Of Village- Chhatni, P.S- Karahgar, Dist- Rohtas At Sasaram Bihar 2.
Sabita Devi, Wife Of Wakil Singh Yadav @ Wakil Singh Resident Of Village- Chhatni, P.S- Karahgar, Dist- Rohtas At Sasaram Bihar ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are fatherin-law and mother-in-law of the deceased and the informant alleges that her daughter died during the course of treatment at N.M.C.H. as she had consumed poison. Further, alleges that the accused persons after marriage were torturing her for nonfulfilment of the demand of a Scorpio vehicle.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43648 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 2/3 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the deceased had consumed poison and her family members had taken her to a government hospital for treatment though she could not survive. It is next submitted that if the accused persons would have been involved in the occurrence, then definitely they would not have taken to a government hospital for treatment knowing very well the consequences of the same i.e. police would be informed. The learned counsel thus submits that the conduct of the family members of the deceased seems to be bonafide. The learned counsel next submits that petitioners otherwise are also separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased and thus, are not aware of the day to day affair which used to happen between the husband and the deceased.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43648 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 3/3 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Karahgar P. S. Case No.03 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T