Udai Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4805 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23407 of 2011 ====================================================== Udai Kumar, Son of Shri haru Mahto, Resident of Village- Madanpur Tole, (Near Pani Tanki), Musaribigha, P.O. & P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad, At present Resident of Village- Taradih, P.O. + P.S. Madanpur, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sri Navin Chandra Jha the District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
3. Sri Bhim Prasad the Sub Divisional Officer, Auranagabad.
4. Sri Rajendra Pathak The Circle Officer, Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.
5. Bhola Das, Son of Late Ram Lagan Das, Resident of Village- Madanpur Tole, (Neat Pani Tanki), Musaribigha , P.O. & P.S. Madanlpur, DistrictAurangabad.(Not A live)
6. Ravi Kumar, Son of Bhola Das, Resident of Village- Madanpur Tole, (Near Pani Tanki), Musaribigha, P.O.& P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.
7. Birendra Bhuiyan, Son of Bhudang Bhuiyan Resident of Village- Madanpur Tole, (Near Pani Tanki), Musaribigha, P.O.& P.S. Madanpur, DistrictAurangabad.
8. Binod Bhuiyan, Son of Late Jariman Bhuiyan Resident of Village- Madanpur Tole, (Near Pani Tanki), Musaribigha, P.O.& P.S. Madanpur, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 15-12-2017 Keeping in view the show cause filed by the respondents and the averments made in para 6, 7 and 8 indicating that after enquiry into the matter it was found that the encroachers are landless persons and the lands have been settled in their favour and the encroachment proceedings were dropped, now, no further action is required to be taken in the matter. Petitioner, if aggrieved by the action taken, may initiate fresh proceedings in
Patna High Court MJC No.4805 of 2014(5) dt.15-12-2017 2/2 accordance to law.
Now, in the light of the show cause filed by the respondents, it is not a fit case where any action for contempt is required to be taken in the matter. The application stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U