Ravish Kumar @ Ravish Singh @ Rabish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43740 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2021 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Ravish Kumar @ Ravish Singh @ Rabish Kumar S/O Suresh Singh R/O Village- Ramchandrapur, Ps. Pipariya, Dist. Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021 dated 13.11.2021 registered for the offences u/ss 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have fired on the informant and his brother and also assaulted them with pistol and iron rod due to that they got severely injured.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43740 of 2023(2) dt.27-07-2023 2/2
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is land dispute between the parties. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. As per injury report, the injured sustained no fire arm injury. The injured, Ramanand Singh sustained injuries caused by hard and blunt substance and the injury No. 1, 4 and 5 are simple in nature. The petitioner is also accused in one more criminal case and he is on bail in the aforesaid case as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2023.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that two injuries are grievous in nature.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T