← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43446/2025bail granted

Bitu Sonar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-05Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43446 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2024 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== BITU SONAR S/O Late Ganesh Sonar Resident of Village- Bonda, L.P. High School, Great Kamrup Metro, P.S.- Sadgaw, District- Gauhati, State- Assam ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 221 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(2), 36, 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 7426.08 liters liquor was recovered from truck and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43446 of 2025(3) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is driver of the truck in question and he has got no knowledge with regard to the nature of goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 221 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T