Pragash Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47884 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2016 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Pragash Sah son of Nathuni Sah.
2. Ram Balak Sah son of Sri Pragash Sah, Both resident of Village- Narma, Police Station- Hathauri, District- Muzaffarpur.
3. Manoj Sah @ Manoj Kumar son of Nathuni Sah.
4. Shiv Shankar Sah son of Ganesh Sah, Both resident of VillageMadhubani, Police Station- Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pancham Lal Jaiswal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 22-12-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. The four petitioners herein are named accused of Meenapur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016 registered under section 307 and other allied sections of IPC.
Owing to the previous case lodged by the sister-in-law of the informant, it is alleged that on the relevant date all the accused persons named in the FIR including the petitioners, entered into the house of the informant and started assaulting him with Danda(s) on his head. When the wife came to rescue him, it is alleged that she too was assaulted by the accused persons. The contention of the petitioners is that there is a land
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47884 of 2016 (4) dt.22-12-2016 2/2 dispute between the parties. Even according to the FIR, a criminal case was going on from before lodged by the sister-in-law of the informant. There is no serious injury received by any of the injureds.
Counsel for the State, on the other hand, refers to the order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge in order to contend that the informant was admitted in the PMCH and had received injury on the skull.
Looking to the allegations and other materials reflected from the records, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Prayer is accordingly rejected. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U T