Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52693 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR Son of Dinesh Ray Resident of Village - Chanarik, P.S. - Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the IPC. Allegedly, on the point of pistol, motorcycle of the informant has been snatched by three accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and only on the basis of confessional statement of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52693 of 2021(2) dt.10-05-2022 2/2 one minor boy namely Vishal Kumar, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that in the impugned order, it has come that some of the witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature of allegation made in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail made by the petitioner is rejected. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T