Abu Sufiyan @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68026 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Abu Sufiyan @ Chhotu Son of Late Ekbal Ansari @ Md. Ikbal Resident of Mohalla-Tikari More,Police Station-Aurangabad(Town),Distt.-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Town P.S.Case No.98 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 149, 337, 323, 435, 436, 427, 307, 332, 333, 353, 353A, 295A and 379,120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of disrupting the communal harmony in the society . The petitioner is named in the FIR.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has bee attributed against him and a large number of people have been made accused in this case. Moreover the petitioner is in custody since 23.4.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68026 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S.Case No.98 of 2018. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T