Babul Kumar @ Bolji Sharma @ Bolji v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52348 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== BABUL KUMAR @ BOLJI SHARMA @ BOLJI Son of Lakshman Sharma Residednt of Village- Gunsa Tola, Behri, Ward No.15, Police StationSingheshwar, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2022 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Supaul Police Station Case No. 63 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
Six persons accosted the informant and others, who were going to purchase cattle and looted a sum of Rs. 200/- from the informant, Rs. 24,000/- from Murtaza, Rs. 50,000/- from Vakil, Rs. 72,000/- from Ali Hussain , Rs. 30,000/- from Md. Salim and Rs. 50,000/- from Abdul Rahim.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52348 of 2021(3) dt.10-05-2022 2/2 the confessional statement of co-accused Rajesh Yadav and Panchanand Das, however, co-accused Rajesh Yadav has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order, dated 27.07.2021, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 24880 of 2021. He further submits that no looted money has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has also not been put on Test Identification Parade.
Regards being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation and the fact that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent inasmuch as three criminal cases of similar nature of offence are registered against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner, at this stage. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.
However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today, if the trial does not show any progress.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √