Badal Yadav @ Maharaja Pratap v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44725 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2026 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Badal Yadav @ Maharaja Pratap, Son of Sahdeo Yadav, Resident of VillageTetarhat, P.S.- Tetarhat, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate Ms. Rakhi Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Teterhat P.S. Case no.14 of 2026, registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) fo the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the orders of Sahdeo Yadav the four named accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed and of having assaulted Poonam Devi causing grievous injury on her head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The dispute is amongst the family members which would be evident from the fact that the informant and one of the co-accused namely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44725 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/2 Sahadeo Yadav are full brothers. The allegations against the petitioner are general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner is in custody since 14.4.2026. It is lastly submitted in reference to the injury report (Annexure-3) that the same does not support the allegation of assault by so many accused persons.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner and others being general and omnibus in nature, the contents of the injury report, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner having remained in custody since 14.4.2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Teterhat P.S. Case no.14 of 2026, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lakhisarai. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T