Ajad Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44260 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2023 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== AJAD RAM S/o- VAKIL RAM R/o- Village- Karmahari Ps- Kudhani DistKaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and later on added Sections 395 and 412 of the IPC.

3. As per prosecution case, informant was a truck driver and after unloading sand from his truck he has parked his truck near Pusauli Railway Gumti and was attending nature's call. In the meantime four persons hide their face in towel came there and snatched his mobile phone and cash of Rs. 52,000/- from informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44260 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2 the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Arun Kumar Ram, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.04.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 101 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T