← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17373/2015disposed

Hari Shankar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-16Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17373 of 2015 =========================================================== Hari Shankar Prasad, son of Late Subash Prasad, resident of village Gram Gadaichak, Post Office-Mahdaiya, Police Station-Meenapur, District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through its Secretary P.W.D. Bihar, Patna.

2. The Bihar State Building Construction Corporation L.T.D., Patna.

3. The General Manager, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation L.T.D., Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy General Manager Bihar State Building Construction Corporation L.T.D., Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pradhan Murli Manohar Prasad, Adv. Mr. Raju Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP21- SANJAY PANDEY =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The petitioner was given a contract for construction of the building and he has completed the same before the time fixed. The petitioner is claiming that the Government has framed a scheme that if a contractor completes the work in advance, then he will be entitled to 1% bonus, but the same has not been given to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17373 of 2015 dt.16-01-2017 2/2 3.

In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to file a proper representation before the competent authority, bringing all the relevant records including the scheme of the Government by which 1% bonus is required to be given in the event the contractor completes the work in advance. If such a representation is filed, annexing the copy of the scheme of the Government, then the authority shall consider the same and give the benefit of the said scheme, if the petitioner qualifies the condition, within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation.

4.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A.

Uploading Date 18.01.2017 Transmission Date