Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52086/2017bail granted

Vikash Kumar @ Karoo @ Vikash Pandit And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-15Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52086 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2017 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar @ Karoo @ Vikash Pandit, S/o-Binod Pandit,

2. Binod Pandit, Son of Jawahar Pandit, Both are Resident of Village-Islamchak, P.S.-Kako, DistrictJehabanad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody since 28.08.2017 in connection with Kako P.S. Case No.85 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the facts that there is case and counter case between the parties and that the injuries having been inflicted on both sides and also that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Rajak, learned Sub-Judge-IV,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52086 of 2017(2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 Jehanabad, in connection with Kako P.S. Case No.85 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be their own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of their failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of their failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T