Patna High CourtSA/120/2011dismissed

Sukhraj Roy And ANR. v. Sanichar Mandal And ORS.

2020-01-09Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SECOND APPEAL No.120 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Sukhraj Roy Uchch Bidyalaya, Nathnagar,, P.O. + P.S. Nathnagar, DistrictBhagalpur

2. Parmeshwar Mandal, son of Mushahru Mandal, residence at Poddar Toli lane, Jogsar, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur, Headmaster, Sukhraj Roy Uchch Bidyalaya, Nathnagar, P.O. + P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Sanichar Mandal, son of Late Bechan Mandal

2. Gohal Mandal, son of Late Bechan Mandal

3. Shyam Mandal @ Shyam Mahaldar, son of Late Bechan Mandal

4. Mot. Bhulia Devi, wife of Late Sukar Mandal

5. Budhu Mandal, son of Late Sukar Mandal

6. Sudhwa Mandal, son of Late Sukar Mandal

7. Rajni Kumar (minor), son of Late Sukar Mandal through his mother Most. Bhulia Devi Guardian and next friend All resident of village Parmalia Tola Nathnagar, P.O. and P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

8.Musia Devi, daughter of Late Kadir Mahaldar

9. Gangia Devi, daughter of Late Kadir Mahaldar

10. Bilti Devi, daughter of Late Kadir Mahaldar

11. Girdhari Mandal, son of Late Datto Mandal

12. Karu Mandal, son of Late Datto Mandal

13. Faugdari Mandal, son of Late Datto Mandal

14. Gauri Mandal, son of Late Datto Mandal

15. Mahram Devi, daugher of Late Datto Mandal All resident of mohalla- Hassanganj, P.s.- Mirjanhat, P.S.- Mojahispur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Gupta For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2020 Vide office notes dated 6.12.2019/12.9.2018, the office has pointed out that the peremptory order dated 8.8.2017 has not been complied with within the stipulated time i.e. the substitution petition with regard to deceased respondent nos. 10 and 14 has not been filed in limitation matter i.e. I.A. No.

Patna High Court SA No.120 of 2011(9) dt.09-01-2020 2/2 2015/13.

Consequently, I.A. No. 2015/2013 (limitation petition) stood rejected as against the heirs of deceased respondent nos. 10 and 14. Hence, limitation petition becomes defective and instant appeal becomes time barred. As a result, the appeal stood dismissed due to noncompliance of order dated 8.8.2017. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U