Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47846 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2017 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Manoj Kumar S/o Devendra Sah, Resident of Village- Mansurpur, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 364, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 21.08.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 30287 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and it is reiterated that except his self-confession before the police, there is no material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence.

4. The petitioner has been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is stated that the charges have now been framed.

5. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody since 19.01.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47846 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T