Patna High CourtMJC/1433/2014disposed

Lakshmi Pandit v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-10The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1433 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7748 of 2008 ====================================================== Lakshmi Pandit S/O Late Amrit Pandit resident of Narayan Nagar, P.O.- Anisabad, P.S.- Phulwari Sheriff, District- Patna, retired Assistant Superintendent, Physical Education, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Bihar, Patna

2. Mr. Chanchal Kumar, The Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

3. Mr. Arbind Kumar, Director, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

4. Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, the District Education Officer, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 771 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11987 of 2008 ====================================================== Kaushal Kishor Singh S/o Late Ayodhya Prasad Singh Resident of Village Pillich, P.S. Parwalpur, District Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Art, Culture And Youth Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Chanchal Kumar, The Secretary, Art, Culture And Youth Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

3. Mr. Arbind Thakur, Director, Art, Culture And Youth Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

4. Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, The District Education Officer, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 10-11-2017 Considering the fact that the only direction issued in the writ petition was to pay the admissible dues to the petitioners

Patna High Court MJC No.1433 of 2014(22) dt.10-11-2017 2/2 and now from the supplementary show-cause filed by the respondents it is seen that the admissible dues have been paid to the petitioners no further indulgence into the matter is called for. In case any quantification of the dues and the consequential effect having on their pension, petitioners have any grievance still subsisting with regard to the matter, they may challenge it afresh in accordance with law but now in the light of the order passed which was only to pay the admissible dues which has now been complied with by the respondents, no further indulgence into the matter is called for.

The application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.