Manu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51621 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -429 Year- 2017 Thana -PIRBAHOR District- PATNA ====================================================== Manu Kumar Son of Manni Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-Anugrah Swa Sadan, P.S.-Pirbahore, Dist-Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Ms. Shalini, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2017 in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No. 122 of 2017 arising out of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 429 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 20 of the NDPS Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged recovery of 15 grams of ganja from the pocket of the petitioner.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody since 19.08.2017 already suffered, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51621 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Patna, in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No. 122 of 2017 arising out of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 429 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T