Satish Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52612 of 2017 (2) dt.14-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52612 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -250 Year- 2017 Thana -ISLAMPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Satish Ravidas, Son of Ravindra Ravidas, Resident of Village- Kobil Bhagalpur, Police Station- Islampur, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 250 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Rule 4/40 of the Bihar Mining and Consumption Rules 1972 and Rule 8 of the Bihar Illegal Mining Transportation, Storage and Prevention Rules, 2003.
Allegation is of recovery of two illegally sand loaded two tractors.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is only a driver of the said tractor and the owner of the seized tractor has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47328 of 2017 and petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52612 of 2017 (2) dt.14-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 250 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T