Chandan Kumar Chaudhary @ Chandan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47583 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47583 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -285 Year- 2017 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Chandan Kumar Chaudhary @ Chandan Chaudhary Son of Ram Chandra Chaudhary, R/o Village- Gidhwas, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nand singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 30 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather co-accused with whom petitioner has enmity, has named the petitioner. It has also been submitted that though petitioner is accused in one more case of similar nature but he was made accused in that case on the basis of confession and now has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in custody since 08.08.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47583 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Araria, in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2017.
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T