← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13028/2019disposed

Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-15Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13028 of 2019 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad Son of Krishna Prasad @ Krishna Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Patel Nagar Ward No.5, Post Office and Police Station and DistrictBhabhua (Kaimur). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra. 5.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

6.

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

7.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 8.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan. 9.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan (Establishment)- cum-Presenting Officer, Siwan.

10.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran, Motihari. 11.

The District Treasury Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 12.

The Accountant General, Birchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna. 13.

The Accounts Officer, Pay and Accounts Office, Birchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha ( GP- 27 ) For the AG :

Mr.Ram Kinkar Choubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-03-2021 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the retiral dues of the petitioner has been paid to him, as such, this application may be disposed of.

Considering the statement made by learned counsel

Patna High Court CWJC No.13028 of 2019(9) dt.15-03-2021 2/2 for the respondents, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority, if he has any grievance left regarding the payment of retiral benefit, and the concerned authority is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner on its own merit within a period of three weeks of its filing. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U