← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58063/2018bail granted

Jitan Choudhary @ Ranjit Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-20Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58063 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2018 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== JITAN CHOUDHARY @ RANJIT CHOUDHARY, S/o Mohan Choudhary @ Toha Choudhary , R/o Vill.- Ainkhan, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Reena Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No.82 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 354, 506 Indian Penal Code and Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, who is in custody since 17.07.2018.

In the written report as well as in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it is alleged that while daughter of the informant was sleeping on the roof, this petitioner tried to misbehave with her. It is mentioned in the written report that petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58063 of 2018(3) dt.20-11-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-1 cum Special Judge, POCSO, Patna, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No.82 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T