Pawan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41871 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Pawan Sah, S/o Late Sikki Sah, R/o Village- Mithanpur, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard Mr. Hemant Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 368 of 2025, CIS No. 368 of 2025, arising out of Mehsi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 103 and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has stabbed the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant to death.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been submitted that in this case, the informant is not the eye witness and that the knife was not recovered. Petitioner is having no criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41871 of 2025(4) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 17.07.2024.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that in this case the informant is the eye witness and from perusal of the postmortem report, it will transpire that both deceased have received stab wound. The postmortem correlates the allegation made out in the F.I.R.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
7. Petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T