Madan Kumar @ Madan Prasad Kushwaha v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53053 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -421 Year- 2016 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Madan Kumar @ Madan Prasad Kushwaha, son of Baidnath Bhagat, resident of Village- Chako Chhapra, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Amrendra Kumar, son of Late Mahajan Mahto, resident of MohallaGandak Colony, Sherpur (House No. D/15), P.S.- Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv.
For the State : Mrs. Asha Devi, APP 85 For the informant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the State.
This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and 138(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
The informant had advanced Rs.2,40,000/- to the petitioner as loan and the cheque issued by the petitioner bounced.
Submission of the petitioner is that there is no material to substantiate dishonest intention at the time of receiving the loan amount. More over, each and every dishonour of cheque does not attract the ingredient of dishonest intention for cheating. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53053 of 2016 (3) dt.09-02-2017 2/2 Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 421 of 2016 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √