Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48789 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2017 Thana -KADAMKUAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ravi Kumar Son of Sri Bilas Mahto resident of Mohalla Chai Tola, P.S. Kadam Kuan, within the township of Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 164 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 363 & 365 of the Indian Penal Code and charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 363, 365 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of kinapping the unsound sister of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no eye-witness of the occurrence and he has falsely been made accused in this case and since the girl is of unsound mind, her statement could also not been recorded. Further there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner and he has been in custody since 25.04.2017 and other co-accused having similar allegation has

already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 31.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38150 of 2017 and petitioner has been in custody since 25.04.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge -CBI -1 cum Addl. Sessions Judge - V, Patna, in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 164 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates

without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T