Patna High CourtCWJC/16933/2007disposed

Anugrah Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-18Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16933 of 2007 ====================================================== Anugrah Narayan Singh son of late Chankya Singh, resident of village Aspura, police station and police station Bikram, District Patna at present retired as Accounts Clerk in the office of Deputy Director, Ground Water Design Division, Minor Irrigation Department, Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Department of Minor Irrigation through The Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Under Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building (Vikash Bhawan), Patna.

5. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Patna.

6. The Director, Ground Water Design Division, Minor Irrigation Department, Patna.

7. The Director, Ground Water Design Division, Patna, campus of Tube well, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014.

8. The Executive Engineer, Bagmati Division, Sitamarhi.

9. The Superintending Engineer, Bagmati Circle, Sitamarhi.

10. The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambuj Nayan Chaubey For the Respondent/s : AC to GP-24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

18-03-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader - 24, makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned by way of filing fresh representation.

The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty, as indicated above.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16933 of 2007 (3) dt.18-03-2015 2/2 It is made clear that if such representation is filed within a period of eight weeks, the competent authority may examine the same and pass appropriate order within two months thereafter.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U