Ramdeo Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9013 of 2003 =========================================================== Ramdeo Jha son of Late Dukhmochan Jha, Resident of village-Haripur, Police Station-Bahera, District-Darbhanga at present residing at Chhapaki Panchayat Bhawan, Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. MEDINI KANT JHA For the Respondent/s : GP-4 Mr. P.K. Shahi Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mr. Vipin Kumar Mr. Shiv Shankar Mr. Rajesh Prasad Choudhary Mr. Vikas Kumar Mr. Vikash Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-08-2018 On 01.02.2018, this Court had made it clear that in case nobody appears for the petitioner, the matter would be decided ex parte. Again on 10.08.2018, nobody had appeared for the petitioner, hence, in the interest of justice the case was directed to be listed on 30.08.2018 i.e. today, however, today also nobody has appeared for the petitioner.

The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 27.09.2002, whereby and where under the petitioner has been dismissed from service.

The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is said to

Patna High Court CWJC No.9013 of 2003 dt.30-08-2018 2/2 have been appointed on the post of Prahari, a Class-IV post in the Automobile Batric Scheme Patliputra Industrial Estate, Patna, a unit of Bihar State Small Scale Industries. In the year 1967, the petitioner is said to have been transferred to Small Tannery Bihta whereafter the Bihar State Leather Industries Development Corporation Limited, Patna came into existence and the petitioner became an employee of the Bihar State Leather Industries Development Corporation Limited, Patna.

The impugned order of punishment dated 27.09.2002 is self speaking and would show that despite publication of notice in the daily newspaper, the petitioner did not turn up to participate in the enquiry proceeding, hence, his services was terminated. The petitioner has in fact failed to plead any cogent ground, in the writ petition, so as to warrant quashing of the order of punishment dated 27.09.2002, hence, I find that there is no merit in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date01.09.2018 Transmission Date