Bhola Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36656 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2011 Thana -MANJHI District- SARAN ====================================================== Bhola Singh Son Of Late Baijnath Singh Resident Of Village- Bangara, P.S. Daudpur, Distt- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Sukhdeo Yadav, s/o Dudh Nath Yadav, r/o village Bharaha Gola, P.S. Manjhi District Saran .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Shankar Modi, learned A.P.P.

The sole petitioner, invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has prayed for quashing of an order dated 12.8.2013 whereby petition filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for discharge on behalf of petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only due to political rivalry false case was instituted and falsely after investigation police has submitted charge sheet also. He submits that there was no material to connect the petitioner, whereas learned A.P.P. by way of referring to the F.I.R. as well as the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36656 of 2013 (3) dt.16-05-2016 2/2 impugned order submits that there was specific case against the petitioner. In the case fire arm was also used. Of -course it is a case that none has received fire arm injury. Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties I have also perused the material available on record. After going through the impugned order, I do not find any apparent error warranting interference.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T