Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58618 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Dhiraj Kumar S/o Sitaram Mahto, R/o Village- Mathokhar, P.S. and District- Shrikhpura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Child Case No.02 of 2017 arising out of Ariyari P.S.Case no.82 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner had been rejected, vide order dated 11.9.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.40534 of 2017 with a direction to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the charge has been framed in this case, he is in custody for about 11 months and he is ready to any condition imposed upon him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58618 of 2017 (2) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J., Sheikhpura in connection with Child Case No.02 of 2017 arising out of Ariari P.S.Case no.82 of 2015.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T