← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/5076/2013disposed

Rudradutta Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-18Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.5076 of 2013 (2) dt.18-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5076 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14050 of 2006 ====================================================== Rudradutta Mishra S/O Late Brajnandan Mishra Resident Of Village & P.O. Kachnama, P.S. Mukhdumpur, District Jehanabad, At Present Kurtha Warsiar Colony, P.O. & P.S. Kurtha, District Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Collector, Jehanabad, District Jehanabad Md. Sohail.

2. Sri Sanjay Singh, The Collector, Arwal, District Arwal.

3. Sri I.D.S. Dhaliwal, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Imamuddin Ahmad, The Director, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. Sri Sanoj Kumar, The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad.

6. Sri Manoj Kumar, The Circle Officer, Kurtha (Arwal). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. M. D. Dwivedi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-05-2016 Petitioner retired on 31.01.1991 as Revenue Karmchari from Circle Office, Kurtha in the district of Jehanabad now Arwal. He moved this Court for payment of his retiral dues. After hearing the parties, a direction was issued to the respondents to ensure payment of provident fund dues to the petitioner with interest.

A show-cause has been filed stating that the admitted dues of the petitioner has been paid. The petitioner submits that in absence of calculation chart and deduction statement, he is not

Patna High Court MJC No.5076 of 2013 (2) dt.18-05-2016 able to make out whether the entire amount has been paid to him. In the facts and circumstance stated above, the contempt application is disposed of with direction to the respondents, particularly, to the District Provident Fund Officer to furnish a calculation chart and deduction statement to the petitioner so that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, he may file his representation for payment of the rest amount before the appropriate forum.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) kunal/- U