Farman Mian And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50018 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Farman Mian S/o Late Alijaan Mian,

2. Lal Mohammad @ Anil S/o Late Alijaan Mian,

3. Khushi Alam @ Gabbar S/o Lajim Mian, All R/o Village- Tuniya, P.S.- Bettiah (M) Manuapul, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court vide order dated 29.03.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11783 of 2017 with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer of bail after framing of charge.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a period of six months has already been expired and up till now charge has not been framed and he undertakes to abide by any condition that may be imposed upon him by this court, if bail is granted. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five thousand)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50018 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Trial No. 475 of 2017 arising out of Bettiah (M) Manuapul P.S. Case No. 18 of 2017 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and appear on each and every date in Court and local police station of the area in first week of every month on failure on their part to appear before the court below / police station on two consecutive dates, without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

Let a copy be served to S.P. of the concerned district. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sushma/- U T