Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61817/2018disposed

Shivam Kumar @ Chunnu @ Chunnu Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61817 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2017 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Shivam Kumar @ Chunnu @ Chunnu Bhagat, Son of Kailash Bhagat @ Kailash Prasad Chaurasiya, Resident of Village- Ladaura, Police StationKudhani (Turki), District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 287 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is that petitioner alongwith other co-accused looted the pick-up van loaded with the good and on the point of gun looted away cash Rs. 10,000/-, mobile and driving license.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that seizure list does not bear the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61817 of 2018(3) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 signature of petitioner and nothing has been recovered from his possession except his own mobile and PAN card. Petitioner has been apprehended only on suspicion and he has not been put on T.I.P. It has been further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 25.12.2017. Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T