Gobind Kumar @ Govind Kumar @ Govind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43639 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-431 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Gobind Kumar @ Govind Kumar @ Govind R/o Lalo Mahto @ Lalu Mahto R/o Village-Bhuthri(Bhuthari), Ward No 03,Panchayat Govindpur- 3, P.O.- Samshipur Bhat, P.S.- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The state of Bihar Advocate General Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(1), 109, 329(4), 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that one Chandan Kumar fired a gun shot upon the informant which hit on his leg while the present petitioner Govind Kumar also fired twice on the informant which did not him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury report of the informant would show that there is a single firearm injury on his leg which is grievous in nature. However, it is on non-vital part of the body and the same is attributable to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43639 of 2025(2) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 co-accused Chandan Kumar. It is further submitted that the wife of one of the co-accused persons has lodged an FIR against the present informant showing thereby that the petitioner and the informant were on inimical terms and hence, he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in custody since 10.05.2025 with no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State, however, opposes the prayer for regular bail.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstance of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 431 of 2024.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) divyanshi/- U T