Sawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52324 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2021 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

SAWAN KUMAR Son of Vijay Ram Resident of Village- Lakri Dhai, Chandwara, P.S.- Muzaffarpur Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Vikram Kumar Son of Vijay Ram Resident of Village- Lakri Dhai, Chandwara, P.S.- Muzaffarpur Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

Vicky Kumar Son of Vijay Ram Resident of Village- Lakri Dhai, Chandwara, P.S.- Muzaffarpur Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.

Vijay Ram Son of Late Arjun Ram Resident of Village- Lakri Dhai, Chandwara, P.S.- Muzaffarpur Town, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case no. 367 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 447, 448, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution story relates to assault to the son of the informant. When she make protest, she was also beaten up by the accused persons and they tried to pull her saree and blouse. Co-accused Vickey Kumar snatched her gold chain.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52324 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties are neighbour and members of both parties have received injuries in the alleged occurrence. There is no injury report to support to prosecution case. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case no. 367 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U