← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8688/2014disposed

Ram Keshwar Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-16Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8688 of 2014 =========================================================== Ram Keshwar Vishwakarma, Son of Late Narsinh Mistry, resident of Hawai Adda Road, Malahchak Last, Police Station- Jehanabad in the district of Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Deputy Director -cum-Deputy Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Arwal

6. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Arwal

7. The Block Development Officer, Karpi in the district of Arwal .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Umesh Narayan Dubey, AC to GP 27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

2. Specific prayer has been made in the writ petition for grant of 1st ACP and 2nd ACP in the pay scale of Rs. 5000-8000/ and 55009000/- respectively.

3. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent State. Specific averments have been made that the said benefits have already been given to the writ petitioner under order of the District Magistrate, Arwal dated 23.06.2012.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8688 of 2014 dt.16-08-2018 2/2

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that monetary benefits have not been received by the petitioner.

5. Without going into the merits of the said dispute, this Court would only observe that if the monetary benefits have not been extended to the petitioner, the respondent no. 5 will ensure that the monetary benefits on account of grant of benefits under ACP are made available to the petitioner within a period of three months from today.

6. Writ petition is disposed off.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date