Ram Shekh Pandit And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10828 of 2010 ======================================================

1. Ram Shekh Pandit, son of Sri Banarsi Pandit, resident of village O.P. Sonupur, P.S. Rosera, District-Samastipur.

2. Ugan Kumar Sah, son of Sri Rameshwar Sahi, resident of village-Dumari, P.S. Siraul, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Commissioner cum-Secretary, Human Resources Department, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Secretary, Bihar Karmachari Chayan Commission, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 4 27-08-2020 Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "The petitioners seek the indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of writ or direction the respondents to quash and be declare the ultra virus the Bihar Special Primary Teachers appointment Rule 2010 and be further the rule directed to violates the reservation policy as framed under BIHAR PADO AVM SEWAO KI RIKTIYO ME ARACHHAN (Schedule Case Schedule Tribe

Patna High Court CWJC No.10828 of 2010(4) dt.27-08-2020 2/3 and other Back ward classes) Act 1991 and any other appropriate writ order or direction for which the petitioners are found legally entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Despite repeated calls and pass over, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. We notice that the matter is an old one, filed in the year 2010 and the issue relates to the period much prior thereto. We also notice that no interim order stands passed. Learned counsel for the State states that with the passage of time, the present petition has become infructuous and perhaps it is for this reason, petitioner is not interested to pursue the petition.

As such, we dispose of the petition, reserving liberty to the petitioners to agitate the surviving grievances, if any, before the appropriate authority or forum in accordance with law on the same and subsequent cause of action, if so required and desired.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J)

Patna High Court CWJC No.10828 of 2010(4) dt.27-08-2020 3/3 pallavi U