Kishor Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42175 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran ====================================================== Kishor Yadav Son of Late Amar Yadav Resident of Village - Lakshmipur, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5), 352, 351(2), 117(1), 126(2), 74, 109, 308(1) and 303(2) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and on account of dispute relating to land an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is further submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on his head and thereafter petitioner along with Abhay assaulted the informant with fists on his mouth and also assaulted the informant's wife and outraged her modesty. Further, the accused persons including the petitioner also demanded extortion of Rs.5 lakhs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42175 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land the alleged occurrence took place. It is next submitted that the injury suffered by the son of the informant is simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T