Vijay Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18415 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kishore Prasad Son Of Late Ram Chandra Prasad R/O Vill. Dumarthu, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Secretary, Health Medical Education and Family Welfare, Patna 3.
Director-In-Chief, Health Services , Bihar, Patna 4.
The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 5.
The Regional Deputy Director Of Health Services, Magadh Division, Gaya 6.
Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Gaya 7.
The Superintendent Anugrah Narain Magadh Medical, Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Rai, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Jaishankar Barnwal SC1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent-State.
Learned counsel for petitioner, faced with the averments made in paragraph no.6 of the counter affidavit filed by Respondent-6, submits that he would be making his application spelling out the details of his pending claims. In order to correctly appreciate the premise for such a submission this Court would reproduce paragraph No.6 of the Counter affidavit filed by Respondent No.6 "6. That it is also stated and submitted that departmental proceeding has not yet concluded by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.18415 of 2011(7) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 Health directorate. So, the question of payment of salary for the suspension period by the respondent No.6 does not arise. As far as other payment is concerned it is pertinent to mention here that after lifting of the suspension order by Director-in-chief, Health Services, Bihar the petitioner joined in the office of the answering respondent on 08.07.2008 and from that date to the date of his retirement all his legitimate and admissible dues have been paid to him. If the petitioner specifically points out towards any due which is resting with the answering respondent it will be cleared in no time."
The writ application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U