Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44806/2025bail granted

Aman Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-22Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44806 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-632 Year-2024 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Aman Raj S/o Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Singh R/o vill - Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samrendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 632 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5), 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, one country made pistol and one live cartridge have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44806 of 2025(2) dt.22-07-2025 2/3 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2024 and has got three criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 632 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44806 of 2025(2) dt.22-07-2025 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T