Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57843/2017rejected

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-13Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57843 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57843 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -227 Year- 2017 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Yadav, son of Sri Shambhu Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village Gadhi Bishanpur, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.227 of 2017, registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 25(1-B) a/26/35 of the Arms Act. The allegation is that the petitioner's pick up van was recovered by the police and country made carbine with one live cartridge was recovered and registration number on the front and back side are different, some papers and identity cards of police constables in the name of the petitioner was also recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is improbable that petitioner will keep two registration numbers on the same vehicle.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57843 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 Having considered aforesaid facts and circumstances and recovery of country made carbine, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected for the present in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.227 of 2017, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within a year. If the trial is not concluded within a year, the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail.

(Arun Kumar, J.) S.Kumar/- U T