Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40118 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

AJAY KUMAR S/o Bindeshwar Rai Resident of Village- Raja Pakar Chauri, P.S.- Rajpakar, District- Vaishali.

2.

Krishna Devi W/o Bindeshwar Rai Resident of Village- Raja Pakar Chauri, P.S.- Rajpakar, District- Vaishali.

3.

Bindeshwari Rai S/o Late Udda Rai Resident of Village- Raja Pakar Chauri, P.S.- Rajpakar, District- Vaishali.

4.

Rinku Rai @ Suchita Kumari W/o Ajay Rai Resident of Village- Imadpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali.

5.

Ajay Rai S/o Surendra Rai Resident of Village- Imadpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-09-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Raja Pakar P.S. Case No.203 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioners are said to have tortured the deceased physically and mentally for non-fulfillment of demand of additional dowry.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40118 of 2020(5) dt.12-09-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is submitted that the petitioners are in-laws and they have no manner of concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. It is submitted that the matter was adjourned 2-3 times but the husband of the deceased has not surrendered before the learned court below.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T