Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50776/2017bail granted

Raju Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50776 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50776 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -218 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHKUND District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Raju Choudhary .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 218 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 35 litres of country made wine.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather recovery ahs bee made from an open field and he has been made accused in this case on suspicion. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 18.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50776 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 218 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T