Ramesh Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40607 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2016 Thana -BHARGAWAN District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Ramesh Sah S/o Mahabir Sah

2. Rukmani Devi W/o Ramesh Sah Both Resident of Village Baijupath, P.S. Bhargama, District Araria. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Bhargama Police Station Case No. 36 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 370, 372, 373 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Act. The petitioner no. 1 is the father of the informant and petitioner no. 2 is her mother. They have been made accused with an allegation that they made the informant marry someone on certain ulterior considerations, who intended to sell the informant to someone else for trafficking.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the allegation made in the First Information Report has been made out of some misconception and it is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40607 of 2016 (2) dt.22-09-2016 2/2 highly improbable.

Considering the nature of accusation, this application is allowed.

Let the petitioners, namely, Ramesh Sah and Rukmani Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Araria, in connection with Bhargama Police Station Case No. 36 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √