Rajesh Prasad @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40046 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-534 Year-2018 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAJESH PRASAD @ RAJESH KUMAR Son of Mainejar Prasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah).

2.

Anand Prasad @ Anand Kumar Son of Mainejar Prasad Resident of VillageBari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 3.

Indrajeet Kumar Son of Laldev Yadav Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.- Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 4.

Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Kumar Son of Bhikham Pasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 5.

Tuli Yadav Son of Late Banarsi Yadav Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.- Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 6.

Awadhesh Prasad Son of Late Deonand Prasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 7.

Mukhdev Prasad @ Mukhdev Son of Late Badri Raut Resident of VillageBari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 8.

Vicky Mahto @ Vicky Kumar Son of Rajdev Prasad Resident of VillageBari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 9.

Chhathu Yadav Son of Late Banarsi Yadav Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 10.

Brij Mohan Prasad Son of Prabhu Prasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.- Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 11.

Dharmendra Prasad @ Dharmendra Kumar Son of Mukhdev Prasad @ Mukhdev Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), DistrictWest Champaran (Bettiah). 12.

Ranjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Kumar Son of Bhikham Prasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah).

13.

Bharat Kumar @ Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Yadav Son of Late Ramji Prasad Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah).

14.

Rajdev Prasad Son of Late Dhari Mahto Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.- Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 15.

Govind Kumar Son of Mukhdev Prasad @ Mukhdev Resident of VillageBari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah). 16.

Shivpujan Prasad @ Shivpujan Mahto Son of Late Vishun Mahto Resident of Village-Bari Tola, P.S.-Mufassil (Bettiah), District-West Champaran (Bettiah).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40046 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/3 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 332, 333, 307, 354(B) IPC registered in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 534 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, West Champaran, Bettiah, in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 534 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40046 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 3/3 iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T