Ravindra Rishidev @ Sada @ Ravindra Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46545 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-778 Year-2023 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.
Ravindra Rishidev @ Sada @ Ravindra Sada Son Of Nago Sada VillageKhawaspur, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Somraha, Distt.- Araria-854318 2.
Nirjala Devi Wife Of Ravindra Rishidev @ Sada Village- Khawaspur, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Somraha, Distt.- Araria-854318 .. ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-09-2024 Heard Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha) P.S. Case No. 778 of 2023 registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the informant found his brother (deceased) below a bridge near railway track, who succumbed to the injuries, while he was taken to the hospital.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46545 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 2/3 falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that it has been alleged that the petitioner no.1 had not wanted to return a sum of Rs.30,000/-, which he had borrowed from the deceased, and he, along with his wife (petitioner no.2), had assaulted the brother of informant and committed murder and thrown him near railway track, who succumbed to the injuries, which fact cannot be sustained in absence of eye-witness of the alleged incidence. The petitioners have clean antecedents. On these grounds, the petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail and he has referred to the paragraph no.9 of the case diary, wherein one Mukesh Singh, who is the son of the informant, has alleged that the petitioners have committed murder of his uncle (the brother of the informant).
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the evidences, which have come in course of investigation, showing complicity of the petitioners in commission of murder of the brother of the informant, I am not inclined enlarge the petitioners on pre-arrest bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46545 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 3/3
7. Accordingly, the present pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U T