Raj Aryan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65358 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2017 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== Raj Aryan, Son of Dayanand Paswan, Resident of Village- Maniyarchak Silaha, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bounsi P.S.Case No. 308 of 2017 registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian penal Code.

Allegation, as per the FIR, is that informant saw two persons trying to flee away with his SUMO vehicle and one of them was apprehended, who is petitioner. It further appears that petitioner is accused in 08 other cases also. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been falsely implicated due to village politics and he is in custody for about a year.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65358 of 2018(3) dt.04-12-2018 2/2 However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within a period of six months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period and there is no laches on the part of the petitioner, the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail to its own satisfaction. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T