← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20195/2011disposed

Arun Kumar Verma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20195 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Arun Kumar Verma Late Govind Lal Das Resident Of Village & P.O- Gunwanti, P.S- Bounsi, Bagathi, District- Araria.

2. Shailendra Kumar Roy S/O Gorijanand Roy Resident Of VillageThekpura, P.S- Hansa, P.S- Raniganj, District- Ararai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Commissioner Cum- Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

4. District Education Establishment Committee, Araria Through District Superintendent Of Education, Araria.

5. District Magistrate, Araria.

6. District Superintendent Of Education, Ararai.

7. Deputy Development Commission, Araria.

8. District Education Officer, Araria.

9. Nill ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ambrish Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dinbandhu Singh Gp9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ application is non-consideration of the case for grant of promotion and benefit of such promotion from the date juniors to the petitioners have been granted.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have been granted benefit of graduate trained scale pursuant to Annexure-4. However, he has not been able to

Patna High Court CWJC No.20195 of 2011(8) dt.22-06-2018 2/2 dispute the fact that juniors to the petitioners have been granted such benefit from a date anterior to grant of promotion to the petitioners.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioners and if it is found that juniors to the petitioners have been granted benefit of graduate trained scale from earlier date, similar benefit should be extended to the petitioners from the date juniors to the petitioners have been granted such benefit. The entire exercise in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U