Patna Municipal Corporation Through Its Chief Executive Officer And ORS v. Phool Chandra Ram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.882 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8517 of 2007 ===========================================================

1. The Patna Municipal Corporation, through its Chief Executive Officer, Budhmarg, Patna

2. Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budhmarg, Patna

3. Chief Engineer, Water Board, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

4. Executive Officer, Water Board, Patna .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

Phool Chandra Ram, Son of Nanhak Ram, Resident of Mohalla- yarpur, Ambdkar Colony, P.S.- Gardanibag, District- Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 24-03-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant, the Patna Municipal Corporation.

The order, dated 11.04.2014, passed in C. W. J. C. No. 8517 of 2007, is under challenge.

The Learned Single Judge has gone by the precedence and allowed the writ application on the ground that the time-bound-promotion is required to be given to the petitioner, keeping in view similar orders passed, which have been dealt with in the impugned order itself.

Patna High Court LPA No.882 of 2014 dt.24-03-2017 2/2 In the opinion of this Court, precedence has been followed by the Learned Single Judge in the earlier adjudication made, which have not been challenged or set aside. Therefore, the Learned Single Judge has committed no error of law. Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 28.03.2017 Transmission Date