Pramod Yadav @ Potan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42086 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Pramod Yadav @ Potan Yadav Son of Wajir Yadav @ Vazeer Mahto VillageRampur, Ps- Chanan, Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, the petitioner assaulted her husband with khanti, causing injury on head and Mantu snatched his gold chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both side had assaulted each other but then the assault was not made by khanti. It is also submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42086 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 that even the impugned order does not record about injury suffered by the husband of the informant. It is next submitted that a specific statement has been made at Para-7 of the anticipatory bail application that injury report of the injured is not available on record till date which creates serious doubt upon the case. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Saurav/- U T