Patna High CourtCWJC/15033/2014dismissed

Munna Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-08-28Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15033 of 2014 =========================================================== Munna Kumar Son of Kedar Thakur Resident of Village- Mainara, P.O. Sikariya P.S. Tiyar, District- Bhojpur (Ara) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi

2. Deputy Inspector General, MET CENTER SHO, SSB, Modern Agro Agencies Building Chakkar Maidan, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Manoj Kr.Singh, CGC Mr. Anjani Kr.Sharan, ASG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent Union of India.

The writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner as constable ignoring his disqualification of being underweight which was found by the Medical Board as well as the Review Medical Board. Candidature of the petitioner was found to be wanting on the various grounds by the Medical Board including some defects like Varicose vein and some other disqualification. The review Medical Board cleared him on all other aspects however even before the Review Medical Board he was found underweight. The petitioner wants that the said disqualification should be

Patna High Court CWJC No.15033 of 2014 dt.28-08-2018 2/2 ignored. No ground has been made so as to assert such right for ignoring the standards laid down, which ensures the non-arbitrary and non discriminatory selection of the candidate as per requirement of the job. Writ petition has been filed in the year 2014, though the petitioner had been declared unfit by the Medical Board as far back as on 28.10.2011.

This Court does not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the respondents. The writ petition is dismissed. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date5.9.2018 Transmission Date NA