Patna High CourtCWJC/14348/2014disposed

Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-07Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14348 of 2014 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Singh son of Late Brahmdeo Singh resident of village - Rudashi, P.S. + District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Department, Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger

5. The District Education officer, Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura

6. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), ( Education Department ), Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh :

Mr. Uma Kumari For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar AC to GA1.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 07-09-2018 The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for granting 3rd A.C.P..

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has drawn attention to this Court in paragraph -8 to the Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents No.5 and 6, which is quoted below:- " That it is most humbly respectfully stated that benefit of 3rd ACP has granted and in this regard as directed by D.E.O. Sheikhpura Middle School Chewara sent a letter to D.D.O., Treasury Officer, Sheikhpura and Accountant General,

Patna High Court CWJC No.14348 of 2014(2) dt.07-09-2018 2/2 Patna vide letter No. 917 dated 4.07.2015 for the payment of 3rd ACP benefit.

In view of the statement made in paragraph-8 of the counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.

In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infractuous.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U